I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I don't really see anything wrong with it.
Heck, the family of the boy is suing her. The paper hides that fact down near the bottom and plays it off as a "routine lawsuit".
I don't doubt killing someone with your vehicle is traumatic. If I had done it, and after I was cleared of any wrong-doing, the family of the boy sued me and alleged that I was drunk (with absolutely no evidence to support that fact), then I'd probably counter-sue as well.
Last edited by Canehdianman; 04-25-2014 at 03:18 PM.
|