Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
That's the funny thing about the PCs current predicament: It really isn't even remotely bad. Redford was horrible as the face of the PCs but by 2016 as Slava mentioned, they could have a balanced budget, no tax increases and strong infrastucture spending. The Wildrose can run on "The PCs are corrupt and entitled", but it won't really register as much as it would under poor economic conditions.
And lest we forget it's going to take exactly 1 video of a Wildrose candidate in 2016 saying gay people should burn in hell and the Wildrose is finished again. No more than 10 seats combined in Calgary and Edmonton if that happens (they have 2 currently), which of course leaves them without a prayer of winning. The Wildrose has the exact same, razor thin margin for error to winning in 2016 as they did in 2012. But no Redford to go after this time. If the PCs select a strong leader I don't like the Wildrose chances in 2016.
|
Which is exactly what they'll do, because all the Wildrose is sound bites of Danielle Smith et all attacking the PC party. They have no real plan combined with a backwoods social values mentality.