View Single Post
Old 04-21-2014, 08:39 PM   #52
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teh_Bandwagoner View Post
As for expacs, I've never really played any of the BF series (seems that boycotting EA is quite easy for me anyway lol), but it seems odd to charge $15 for extra maps that are rehash of old maps. At least with other games (Borderlands, Blizzard Games, Bioshock, Last of Us), you get a lot of new content with the expacs. But then again, maybe there's more to the BF expacs than just maps? I've never played them so I wouldn't know heh.
I never played a BF game prior to this one. I too used to be baffled by the map pack and why anyone would drop money on such a thing. It seemed like a waste of money.

Truth be told, I had to be harangued into it by friends. 200 Hours of game play later and I don't regret it one bit. Map packs add more than just maps in the way it changes game play. It adds new weapons and most of all, for a multi-player based game, it adds game play formats.

Now the exception here, that was brought up prior to my post aswell, was the Second Assault pack, which was a re-release of old maps. The thing to remember is these maps were voted on. This is essentially an all-star map pack with what people considered to be the best maps in BF 3.

Point is, the map packs add $15 worth of additional game play in my mind. If you aren't an FPS fan, or don't enjoy huge amounts of variation in your game play then they don't make sense.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Blaster86 For This Useful Post: