Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
In the last few pages you made statements unsupported by facts.
You also made statements and denied them.
You have expressed an opinion based on your conviction which is admirable.
However, you conveniently made convenient assumptions in order to support your conclusion and you omitted facts in the process.
I believe you are not being objective because of your genuine anger with Feaster.
In my opinion Feaster hatred started long before he deserved to be hated.
The man did a lot of good things that he gets no credit for.
I believe he should be criticized for the things he had control of and the things he actually did wrong. There is a lot of material there too.
|
I gave my opinions and I never denied anything that I wrote. If you interpreted it that way, you should brush up on your reading comprehension.
I don't hate Feaster, he's probably a fine man. He just wasn't a very good GM. Just because I criticize someone it doesn't mean I hate them. You have a very juvenile way of looking at things.