Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks
But you did say that, you said that the deal was too good and therefore Feaster must not have been involved, it must have been Burke. You're just making up facts to support your position. Everything that we've been told shows that Burke spent the first part of his time doing a full evaluation of the organization, after he did his evaluation and presented his recommendations to ownership then Feaster was fired. There is nothing I've seen that shows he was secretly doing Feaster's job the whole time.
|
Well considering the only deal he won before Burke came, was acquiring Cammallari, and even than we got smaller, it's kind of hard to see him finally winning one without outside input.