Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
Looked up the stats..
Kane had 1 more goal and 2 more points than Backlund this year, though mind you he did play fewer games. But Backlund is easily the more defensively responsible player. So if Kane+ gets the trade done, then why doesn't Backlund, Hudler and a 2nd? I think we overvalue 5th overall picks due to our current situation and demand for them (which does make sense to us, but you have to see it from a different perspective). The Isles have been doing what we're doing for years, though. They've got Tavares coming into his own, and a young top 6 that is really start to step it up offensively as well. They made the playoffs last year, but were decimated by injuries this year. They've got some top end. By adding Hudler and Backs, you're adding some really good (and needed) depth, 93 points worth of offense and defensive reliability after your top 6. Unless the Isles are strictly seeking help on their blue line, that's some pretty good return for a great, but not outstanding pick.
But there are likely much more appealing offers that will be made that we can't match. That is, if a team like the Oilers or Winnipeg is willing to overpay. But I think the Oilers might also trade their pick for immediate help.
|
All about star power.
In hockey having one player capable of putting up 80+ on the ice is always better than multiple players adding up to that point total.
E. Kane has that perceived potential. Backlund does not. Regardless of E. Kane's current stumbles, he is young enough to still have that star power potential. It makes his value exponentially higher. Generally, good hockey trades don't involve splitting up an assets value into smaller pieces.
Players like Hudler also don't have as much value as you'd think. Players of his age and skill are much more easily attainable on the free agent market.