Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey
What does that have to do with anything? Fact is Bouwmeester had a strong year and drastically increased his trade value. His value at the time of the trade is all that is relevant. We should be satisfied with less than market value because a year before it was less? That makes no sense. If Feaster passed on this deal he dropped ball huge. That's all there is to it. The value of Tatar and Nyquist last year was far superior to what we got from St Louis. It's over now so oh well but the justifications people come up with are terrible.
|
Yeah, really weird how people try to use that as some sort of crutch.
If we dealt Gio for a 2nd round pick, and said "well 3 years ago, he probably wouldn't have got that" would it make the trade any better?
Just really odd logic