View Single Post
Old 04-09-2014, 03:16 PM   #48
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
Yes, this motion clearly illustrates that 100% of WR MLA's are anti-gay while only 66% of PC MLA's are too.
Yep. I'll take 66% rotten over 100% rotten. And there are two other parties who are 0% rotten (on this issue).

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
My argument has nothing to do with the content of the bill. It is very simply that if a bill has not authority to compell anyone to do anything then that bill should not be written, discussed, voted on, or passed. The government should not waste its limited time on platitudes.
Just a theory, but perhaps Hehr did this as a non-binding motion because opposition parties only have limited opportunities to introduce legislation?

If it passes as a non-binding motion, it indicates the political will may exist to make a binding resolution later if the school boards do not comply voluntarily.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote