Well it's seriously funny because still only ghree person has actually compared Haydn fleury to the other top prospects. One said he was too slow (wrong fleury'a strongest attribute is his skating). Saying he doesn't have top end potential. Yes he does, he's big fast strong smart can really play in all situations. Third someone said because that's the consensus. Wtf? Tell me why break down why dal colle is better. Don't just say he is better. What is it that sets him apart? I have said continually players that are slow and lazy don't belong as top five picks. That's my argument against him. What is your argument about fleury? I'm still unclear.
|