Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Here's something that's unlikely to surprise anyone other than First Lady... the Wildrose Party are not "fiscally conservative, socially liberal".
Here's proof:
Kent Hehr presented to the legistlature a non-binding motion to encourage "all school boards to develop policies to support students who want to lead and establish gay-straight alliance activities and organizations".
All Liberals and NDP were for. The PCs were split: 12 for, 23 against. All Wildroses were against.
Seems like it's pretty clear who fits where on the social axis of the political spectrum.
Link: Edmonton Journal |
Nice how you go right after the Wildrose but ignore that the government made up of ahem "Progressive" Conservatives was the main reason it was defeated.
Did you even read or try and dig around why the Wildrose defeated it?
ZOMG they want to burn homosexuals see see!
Do you check under your bed at night for Wildrose members?