View Single Post
Old 06-04-2006, 10:09 PM   #293
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_MacDonald
There are theories that contend all of the above. The approach, attack angle, ability to control the vehicle, and damage to the Pentagon suggests something other than commercial airliner. It is up to the individual to decide what information is believable. If an airliner hit the Pentagon, it was NOT pilotted by Hanjour. A 270 degree turn while losing 4000 feet in altitude is not possible for the best pilots in the world, let alone a guy who could not manage a single engine Cessna on a straight on approach. Yet Hanjour was supposed to perform this miraculous turn AND maintain control of the plane at full throttle (500+ mph) with meer inches between the engines and the ground. That is a physical impossibility. Add in the numerous coincidences that would have been required for this to come to fruition and it just doesn't add up. The "official" story would not hold up in a court of law. The physical evidence doesn't suport it, and the expert testimony would rip it to pieces. But it is up to the individual to look at the data and decide for themselves. I recommend people make the effort to do the homework and learn the facts. Its interesting as hell and very eye opening.
Hey I don't know all the details and the whatnots, but some really big questions arise out of these theories. Maybe the biggest one being "how could they be so smart and so dumb at the same time"?

If "they" (the people you believe were behind all of this) were smart enough to pull off this masterpiece, why were the dumb enough to A) crash the wrong model of airplane into the building or B) plant wreckage from the wrong kind of plane at the crash site or C) fire a missile into an office building in the middle of a major city and hope nobody notices or D) if they did make that plane "disappear" and murdered all the passengers, why didn't they just crash that plane into the building in the first place instead of going through this whole rigmarole of pretending it crashed into the building?

I don't trust Bush and his cronies any more than you do, but this hoax stuff is impossible to believe. It just doesn't add up. If the intent was to create an attack on the same scale as Pearl Harbor then why did they make it so damn complicated?
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote