Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Pardon me for not knowing this, but is the theory that it was a 737 and not a 757 (or the other way around) that crashed into the Pentagon? Or is the theory that it was a commuter jet? Or was it a missile?
|
There are theories that contend all of the above. The approach, attack angle, ability to control the vehicle, and damage to the Pentagon suggests something other than commercial airliner. It is up to the individual to decide what information is believable. If an airliner hit the Pentagon, it was NOT pilotted by Hanjour. A 270 degree turn while losing 4000 feet in altitude is not possible for the best pilots in the world, let alone a guy who could not manage a single engine Cessna on a straight on approach. Yet Hanjour was supposed to perform this miraculous turn AND maintain control of the plane at full throttle (500+ mph) with meer inches between the engines and the ground. That is a physical impossibility. Add in the numerous coincidences that would have been required for this to come to fruition and it just doesn't add up. The "official" story would not hold up in a court of law. The physical evidence doesn't suport it, and the expert testimony would rip it to pieces. But it is up to the individual to look at the data and decide for themselves. I recommend people make the effort to do the homework and learn the facts. Its interesting as hell and very eye opening.