A comment on the released video.
This is NOT security video from the system used to cover any federal or state government building. The resolution and frame rate does not meet the government security standard. This looks like the observation video from a parking gate camera used to capture and digitally analyze employees pictures as they enter a restricted lot. The release of this video is NOT convincing in any manner. The vidoe system in use at ALL federal facilities is ultra-high resolution and captures data at 30 frames per second. Any images captured can be enlarged 4 or 5 times without any degradation of picture quality. As well, all building are covered in a mesh configuration, meaning two cameras are on any one spot at any given time. The cameras are also set in positions where it is impossible to tamper with them and they are protected in secure enclosures that are damn near indestructable. Since this is the Pentagon, you can be sure that there would be extra devices in use, like infrared and motion sensor equipment. All of this data would lead to irrefutable proof of what struck the Pentagon. The failure to release this data supports the claims that something is not on the up and up.
The Shanksville crash is also another huge question mark. The government has never explained how an engine, items from the cabin of the plane, and human remains ended up 8 and a half miles from where the impact crater (another anomoly in this event). There are other inconsistencies as well. What's quite interesting is the 9/11 Commission Report ignored large chunks of evidence and refused to hear testimony from witnesses that didn't fit their story. There is so much evidence of something larger than was represented by the government, and its not just a string of coincidences. I could go into great detail, supported by experts in their fields of research, stories and facts in the media during the events that have been glossed over, and testimony from those that were first responders. But why bother? If you question the highly questionable story that has been accepted as fact, and demand the inconsistencies be expalined, you're a conspiracy "wing nut theorist", even if you have 1000 times more information on the subject matter than those you are arguing with.
|