Can we get back to the issue here?
The issue is, the government is proposing legislation that effects elections. Canada's neutral elections body, as well as other experts, are suggesting that not only did the government not consult the body charged with oversight of elections, they actively misrepresented that body in order to propose legislation that have overtones threatening the basic democracy of the system. And then the LIED about consulting them. In Parliament.
Seriously here, the government is actively misrepresenting elections canada in order to pass legislation of dubious necessity that they aren't even defending. How is this defensible, in any way?
