Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Good lord. Now we don't think that the premier should have top people in her staff? I get the partisanship, but gimme a break. I'm not even a PCAA supporter and I can see that these are significant positions and should be staffed by well qualified and well compensated people.
I was just noting that he was a partner at a law firm before that position, I don't know that you have to be one in order to get there. Is it that much of a stretch to suggest that the premier is going to hire professionals for these roles though, and they're going to be compensated in line with the private sector?
|
Where did I say any of that?
You're the one insinuating that we REQUIRED a senior partner of a law firm to be the premier's chief of staff, and because of that we have to pay them the same as what they would be paid outside of government.
Why not show us the data you've used to conclude this? Is the premier's chief of staff pretty much the same job as senior partner of law firm, yes or no?