Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon@Oct 11 2004, 10:31 PM
Agreed. I hear exactly what you're saying. I'd prefer to argue on about the actual validity of the OFF being a 'major' cause/reason/factor (as opposed to it not being a factor at all, not in its legitimacy as a beef) in the war.
Dis, I'll say it so you can hear it. You do not believe that the OFF was a 'major' rationale for going to war. It was a 'major' reason the war occurred.
If I don't have it right this time, I'm afraid I'll never get it right. 
|
Yes, of course the theory is debateable, as is any theory. I think things could've been different without France and Russia's financial interests (within their governments Lanny) in Iraq. Key word in that sentence is COULD'VE....notice I didn't say WOULD'VE.
Now if we can get Cam and Lanny on board....and oh...the potty mouthed Kermitology as well then we can all move past this collossal waste of time!
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|