Quote:
|
There was evidence on which the judge could conclude that the respondent’s chronic pain resulted in a substantial possibility that her pain adversely would affect her ability to work. There was an evidentiary link between the medical evidence assessing the respondent’s pain and disability and yoga as treatment. The judge did not error in principle awarding the yoga club membership. There was evidence to support the quantum and little, if any, to counteract it.
|
So what's crazy about it exactly? The TJ considered evidence, much of which was uncontradicted, and came to a figure based on that evidence. I don't know why you posted the BCCA decision, it's not like they're going to overrule a TJ's conclusions drawn from the evidence presented to him/her. Don't want to read the whole thing, really, but there's nothing that jumps out at me as absurd there.