See this is my point.
I haven't said I don't believe in global warming but I have three guys rushing out to find quotes and article proving there is.
One guy even uses the word rudimentary. Ever looked up the word rudimentary in a dictionary?
"Of or relating to basic facts or principles; elementary"
It isn't fact
It isn't elementary
You think it to be correct so anyone that would even suggest we slow down and really come to an understanding on this would come across as the unwashed.
Dangerous way to think.
another comment ... right wing think tank. That's funny too ... but it comes down to chicken or the egg. Does a scientist get paid to think one way? Could be. Chances are, however, the think tank finds a guy that thinks their way and funds him, just like 100s of left wing "think tanks" are doing for the other side.
Doesn't discredit or prop up either side.
I can run around the net finding articles too, but in doing so you guys have completely missed my point.
It's not a fact. There are different opposing opinions, and with the implications in play for something this vast and serious some calm and trepidation is in order.
To argue that is crazy.
Shouldn't we all make high impact decisions carefully and with all the information possible?
|