Whether you think it works that way or not, you're still comparing the two subjectively. We're not arguing semantics, you're arguing based on subjectivity and calling it objectivity.
If you can't get 100% of rationale people to agree on it being better, it's not objective, it's subjective. Good luck with that.
Mozzarella is objectively stretchier than Cheddar, but is subjectively better.
Objectivity concerns itself only with indisputable facts. Not with opinions, feelings, or popularity. Objectivity just is or isn't. There is no middle ground. Even the notion of "better or worse" means you are likely comparing something on a subjective level.
|