[Iowa_Flames_Fan]

Originally Posted by White Doors

So i tried it: the first one that popped up was:

http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu...ndRobinson.pdf

LOL.

I STILL contend that there is NOT a scientific consensus on human caused global warming.

Well, it's at least better than "Friends of Science." But you'll note that the "refereed scientific journal" that published this finding is The Wall Street Journal. The article is also nearly 10 years old.

Also, this article doesn't say we're not causing global warming. It says that global warming is a "myth." Remember how I said that the fringe scientists who now say global warming isn't bad, and isn't our fault were saying it was a myth 10 years ago?

What you WILL find is debate--which is healthy--but I've yet to see anything that indicates that the legions of scientists publishing in major journals are all just wrong about this topic.

Your implication seems to be that all of those scientists, in cahoots with the left, are using exaggerations and alarmist scenarios to frighten us. Almost sounds like a conspiracy theory, no?