View Single Post
Old 03-23-2014, 02:20 PM   #922
para transit fellow
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
My understanding was that Stelmach made changes to existing deals. So if a company had a deal for the next 5, 10, or 20 years at a certain rate; that rate was going to change going forward.

I don't mind telling companies the new rate on new deals is going up, but to change existing deals is a very poor way to conduct business.
Then we were fools to offer 20 year rate deals. Where is the business savy from the government?

The original oilsand players already had a couple of changes to their rate deals by the time Stelmach proposed their royalty rate changes. Funny how they were happy to accept a new rate that was lower yet balk at a rate increase...

Indeed Sara Palin once raised the royalty rates during her term as governor. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aYdZoyTvFrTc

and yes the oil companies were not happy...

in the end Alberta Companies all got off better than they started as stelmach backed down on royalty increases - and switched the rate to the price of bitumen.
para transit fellow is offline   Reply With Quote