View Single Post
Old 08-04-2004, 01:19 PM   #13
Cowperson
CP Pontiff
 
Cowperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A pasture out by Millarville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nfotiu+Aug 4 2004, 07:08 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (nfotiu @ Aug 4 2004, 07:08 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-AaronSJ@Aug 4 2004, 06:45 PM
No problem -- It's a fairly common misconception about our taxation system. I actually had this discussion recently with a family member who was convinced that having an income in a higher tax bracket would result in considerably more taxes and even once turned down a promotion because of this belief.

If this was the case, you wouldn't see many people take jobs that earn $35,000 to $40,000... (and there are a lot of them in this country!).
There is one caveat to this whole thing, and I've seen it happen. The formulas used for calculating withholding are not as robust as the actual tax formulas. I believe the withholding formulas take a more simplistic approach and apply a flat percentage on your whole income depending on which withholding bracket you are in. Therefore if your raise just passes the threshhold, you can get a paycheque that is less. You do end up with more money overall once you fill in your tax return, but it is possible to end up with less on a paycheque by making more. [/b][/quote]
I think any Canadian who has gone from $40,000 to about $60,000 in income is fairly astonished at how little they advance in terms of the money they take home.

Cowperson
__________________
Dear Lord, help me to be the kind of person my dog thinks I am. - Anonymous
Cowperson is offline   Reply With Quote