Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
I have a challenge for you. Find anywhere on this forum where I said I like, support or agree with George Bush and his personal ideas and agenda. From day one before he was even elected I knew the guy was a complete ######. Never have I supported him or have I bought into the ideas as to why he invade Iraq. Doesn't mean I can't support getting rid of a mass murderer who gasses his own people.
You say"seems like you did to me and others" well show me then wise guy.
|
How about you go back and look at your posting history. You have a history of popping up and supporting those that have taken the very pro-Bush stance. You're always right there side by side with White Doors, HOZ and Azure defending the man and his policies. For a guy who doesn't like him, you sure support alot of his ideas. Just go through your post history and you will see the trend.
Now, back to the thread, which I am not going to let you run away from a la White Doors.
And who should decide who these "radicals" are? I certainly hope not you! I wouldn't trust you to pick the color of socks someone should wear in the morning.
You're also going to have to point out these "fanatical Islamic governments" you are refering to? I hope the fellas your hero (Dubya) likes to hold hands with (that would be the Saudis) is at the top of that list?
And why can't you compare a small group of right wing religious zealots in the USA to anyone in the middle east? A zealot is a zealot. Both have made reference to a religious faction being eliminated. Both have openly suggested the assassination of world leaders. Both have encouraged politically bombings of innocents to further their twisted agendas. Why are they not comparable? Because you don't know anything about the middle east or Islam or the people in general? Or is because you just can't believe that anything in the west could be wrong or have an agenda?