View Single Post
Old 03-21-2014, 07:00 AM   #2538
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
Im not sure if that is sarcastic or not but that reads like something industry wrote to make it appear like the CRTC is doing something. I figure they wanted 2 year contracts all along but needed the government to force them to do it to avoid colusion charges when they lockstep the price increases that follows.

All I ask for is 2 things. Mandatory separation of device subsidy and the monthly fee. And third party companies able to rent spectrum at a competive rate.
I don't think they actually wanted 2 year contracts, but the reality is that they did have a determental affect on the consumer. The telcos raised their rates and got far more restrictive on device upgrades and cancellations than they were before.

Nice idea, but they underestimated who they were doing business with.
CaramonLS is offline