Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
Oh I'd believe it for sure, so long as they point out such cuts are likely to cripple service offerings or create a massive infrastructure deficit, which of course they wouldn't do because they would lose voters hand over first. Much easier and more conveninent from a political standpoint to keep it to "Cutting waste, increased efficiencies, cutback politicians salaries and benefits" and other vague, barely defined terms.
|
If cutting spending = massive infrastructure deficits/cripples services
Then how come hugely increasing spending didn't equal massive infrastructure surplus/best services in Canada? That's exactly what we've done by piling on all this debt, and yet there doesn't seem to be any correlation...
Something doesn't add up here.