Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ
Guys. If you read the actual issue (which I'm assuming most didn't). They base the team rankings on prospects & full time NHLers that are 23 years old or younger (I think 23 is the cutoff but not 100% sure). This is how they've always done the team rankings.
That's why you see puzzling rankings like the Oilers 11th with only one prospect in the top 50.
|
I read that but I don't see all these top 23 year old younger players on the Ducks roster or their prospect base to put them at #1. How do you not place the Avalanche at #1 if you look at 23 year old and under talent?