Quote:
Originally Posted by Agamemnon
"Member countries account for around 50% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, GDP and population. Unlike the Kyoto Protocol (currently unratified by both the United States and Australia), which imposes mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions, this agreement allows member countries to set their goals for reducing emissions individually, with no mandatory enforcement mechanism."
It doesn't sound ideal, but kudos for bringing up an alternative to Kyoto.
Do you support this initiative as 'the way' to go?
|
There are issues with this proposal as well. It isn't ideal, but it has different strenghts and weaknesses from what Kyoto does.
The idea is to spur discussion and come up with better ideas, not to silence opposition to existing ones.