Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
I have no problem keeping Colbourne but why doe some on CP get up in arms when some one proposes trading a youngster if it makes the flames better? If I go by what some on CP post then none of our youngsters are available . That's fine if you want to see the future smallest team in the NHL. If we want to get bigger in the top 6 with someone that is ready for the NhL then I doubt our veterans like Wideman will bring that in.
I've seen posts from some saying re-sign Cammi, keep Hudler, keep Byron and hopefully Gaudreau makes the big team next year. Granted not all in same post, but that's what it adds up to when you collect them together.
I would like to keep Colbourne but nobody should be untradeable .
|
I am not claiming he is untradeable but why can't we let the young guys show their full potential before people propose a trade? The weird part was when people were saying, what happens if the youngster ended up a bust in a few seasons? That means we can't trade them. NHL is a gamble.. there are some good prospects who turned into a bust and some who other thinks don't have a chance turned out to be a good NHL player. If the Flames didn't gamble on Fleury before, would we find out how good an NHL players he become? Just tired of people always thinking we should trade so and so because we can get so and so for him.