Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
All of us players could vote for someone who hasn't contributed much to these meetings. Even if they turn out to be another player it wouldn't be a huge loss then.
activeStick hasn't been very helpful. He has 3 posts, 2 about food and 1 was his vote.
|
Problem with that is that the only reason that someone like Pharm has a lot of posts is because Oling singled him out as someone who hasn't posted, voted him out, and then Pharm kept posting more and more to try to defend himself.
If we try to switch to someone who currently has one or no votes, it further spreads out the votes and makes it less likely that we can reach enough of a consensus by the first deadline. If our votes are roughly spread out across 3 candidates as the deadline approaches, then management could either sow discontent to prevent us from lynching anyone, or even change their votes to prevent anyone from getting lynched (although they'd risk exposing themselves by doing that).
That said, I'm willing to go along with this as long as there are enough votes that it's actually going to produce a 'front-runner' and not just split the current two-way race 3 ways.