Quote:
Originally Posted by 19Yzerman19
Why would you have to prove this? I recognize you're not a cop but I don't see anything that suggests this.
|
Just what I was told
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19Yzerman19
It applies everywhere, not just areas that are accessible to the public, but you still have to do the things it tells you not to do in order to commit an offence and be punished with a ticket.
|
By having tint on his windows, isn't that committing the offence? I know the wording is a bit hazy in the "A person shall not install, replace or cover" bit, and interpreting whether or not that means having it on the car at all or simply the act of having it installed.
You want an even more messed up one (in the way it's worded) how about the "Widened exhaust outlet" VER. That one's a friggin' mess, but still gets enforced and held up in court.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19Yzerman19
I'm pretty sure this is simply wrong. Intent has nothing to do with these offences. If there's an element of intent, it's a criminal provision, which can't be enacted by the Province.
|
Well it's not a moving violation, therefore my understanding is by simply having your vehicle registered it implies you intend to drive it.
Seems like a bit of a stretch to me as well, but this isn't the first time I've heard about it happening. I'm just passing on what a cop said when we were having this exact discussion a few years ago. This was what I took away from the discussion.