Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agamemnon
I just don't get the stick-our-head-in-the-sand strategy. What's that supposed to do?
I figure if humans are responsible for global warming, they (we) should fix it. If we're not... what have we lost by trying to better the place? What are the massive cons to cutting emissions? I know a lot of health issues related to air and pollution (both in humans and other species) could be cleared up.
To those who constantly wack Kyoto: Whats your plan? Do nothing, and accept that humans are 100% not responsible? Seems like one side is taking a HUGE gamble and the other is playing it safe. You tell me which is which.
|
You dont seem to get it. Humans are NOT the cause of global warming.