Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
That list also does something else: It ends the complaint that all the WR does is critique and not offer alternatives.
Now the debate is the merits of the alternatives.
|
Meh. I've gone through their budget documents in the past and they're far from impressive. They often rely on one or two big things to balance the books and its just not feasible. For example during the 2012 election they were claiming a $2B savings from the carbon capture program and it just wasn't there to be saved.
I will give them credit that at this point they are saying they can't make it balance though.