It would be a sad day indeed when I felt I had to post links to back up my 'claim' (?) that Bush is not indeed as bad as Hitler and also my other crazy claim (?) that a passenger jet did indeed hit the pentagon.
These people, are facts - no matter what Lanny spouts off about with assorted links to more questions. Look - questions are good - but Lanny is saying that he does not think a passenger jet hit the pentagon and Bush is just as bad as Hitler, there is no debate anymore.
There is clearly a lack of historical knowledge on the other poster's part and it is an excercise in futility to argue otherwise.
Why should I post links denying outrageous conspiracy theories?
All one has to do is look it up in the encycopedia for cripes sakes.
Ok.. Here you go:
Here's Hitler. Lots of other links. Spend some time, have a look around.
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article...uery=Hitler&ct=
Here's Bush - let's see if everyone can tell the difference in the two.
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article...W%2C%20Bush&ct=
Here's 911:
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article...1%2C%202001&ct=
Those people are facts. If you have troubles with them they are yours and yours alone. Or you can take them up with Encyclopedia Britannica.
They are a questionable source.. LOL
All in all, this is the end result when history classes aren't even a mandatory in school. I'm sure half the people on here can't even recall living with the cold war.
Yes - a sad day indeed.