Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
As opposed to losing him for nothing as a UFA?
No really sure I understand that logic? That somehow Calgary will get better trades, deals with other GMs and other players because they decided to keep Cammy rather than trade him? And could very well lose him for zero assets?
would you care to explain your logic, cause I don't see how keeping Cammy on a struggling, rebuilding team for 1.5 months is more beneficial than trading him for a couple of later round picks?
|
If you trade for less than value, you'll become known to do so and never get value in the future. See: Feaster.