Iginla was within his rights to pick only one team. By exercising that right, he was pretty much guaranteeing the trade return would be poor.
There may be some dispute over why Iginla had that right to pick only one team, and how he communicated his choice to the Flames. What I don't understand is why people are blaming Feaster for the return. What exactly would another GM have done to extract more value in a situation where - because of matters out of his control - he had no leverage?
|