Quote:
Originally posted by Lanny_MacDonald+Oct 10 2004, 03:06 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lanny_MacDonald @ Oct 10 2004, 03:06 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Bingo@Oct 10 2004, 08:20 PM
I think if you read back you'll see I didn't ban them in any way shape or form. I do think you tend to pull the fringe into the debate more than most. I could post Newsmax or Media Research Center or WorldNet views all day that would prop up the right side and bash the left, but they wouldn't be any more of a confirmation in this debate than fluff from the other side.
But call one of them a "great article" and you're bound to get some differing views. That's pretty much why I don't post links to articles on the US election. Seems like everyone of them these days are coming from a jaded point of view.
|
The fringe? The Guardian is fringe? Okay. I guess anyone left of FoxNews is conisdered fringe these days. Hopefully the Neo-cons get bounced so Fox returns to the fringe where it belongs and some normalcy returns to the political spectrum. [/b][/quote]
Actually I wasn't calling the Guardian in particular the "fringe" but some of the other stuff you've posted that has no real anchor in proven reality.
Have you noticed you're pattern yet buddy?
I point out the article you posted had a fairly sharp axe to grind ... you rub O'Reilly in my face.
I point out that you always rub O'Reilly in my face regardless of the situation and you come back with "your hero O'Reilly"
I suggest you grow up and you take a run at Fox News.
I've heard of one trick ponies, but I'm not sure you're even that.
I honestly don't care if we agree Lanny, in fact I think I'd sleep better at night if we were held appart by a lot of real estate on the old opinion pole, but I don't feel the need to take a run at you or make pathetic jokes if I disagree with your opinion.
Why don't you try the same with me?