Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
What do you see as the huge flaws in evolution?
|
It creates a dichotomy and is now a mongrelized term associated with its counterpoint creationism. The idea of evolution makes sense, there is sense and research to back it up but the argument loses ground when it excludes the possibility of anything other than deterministic physical law.
The debate between the two creates a polarity of philosophy that is unnecessary. Its foolish to claim one knows everything about spirituality when the debate becomes defined by deism vs atheism. The flaw is not in the ideas or evidence supporting it but in the close minded view of many of its professors much like Catholicism. Its followers misrepresent the complexity of reality and define it with rigid absolutes. No room for esotericism, spirituality or intuition; only deism or atheism. Its like the boundaries are defined before the conversation/debate begins. There shouldn't be debate, the moment you start to believe in something you stop thinking. If someone tells you you're wrong ask why instead of asserting you are not.