Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Ice Player
I think the problem here is your interpretation of HIGH REWARD. I don't think it means "best player in the draft". That was ridiculous hyperbole from Feaster and Weisbrod, now departed. It may turn out to be a wasted pick, Jankowski may not work out, but calling it a bad pick if he doesn't turn out to be a star but just a decent player, at 21st overall in a so so draft year, is just wrong.
|
I am simply saying it was a bad and unnecessary gamble given the quality of the other prospects on the board. It was true the day the pick was made. It is more true today given the progression of the prospects. Now we are left hoping he just might catch up to one of the players we should have picked.