Quote:
Originally Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard
How do they pragmatically differ? Both times they are human remains (one it includes flesh that decomposes and it is left with bones; and in the other it is bone fragments that are put into a blender and turned into what people know as ashes). The end result is the exact same.
|
Agreed. How is a lake any different than a cemetery? It's not. In much the same way that a bowling alley is the same thing as a box of chocolates. They are both man made. People enjoy them. You wouldn't want your dog to take a #### in either of them. To-may-to, to-mah-to.
All this talk about coyotes, fish, deer, and squirrels... y'all seem to be missing the point. We're not talking about wildlife. We're talking about an allegedly sentient human being taking their dog to a cemetery to take a crap on another person's grave.
Now maybe this woman is dumber than Bambi, and evidence seems to suggest that it would at least be a fair match if they played each other on Jeopardy, but she's still a person intentionally taking her dog to a place which we all (to different levels, obviously) consider off limits, or at least a little different than the goddamn dog park.
So in conclusion, if a coyote strolls on through the cemetery and happens to take a dump on Uncle Gus's grave, well, that's the way it is. If a stupid and lazy person intentionally takes Rover in there to take a dump on Uncle Gus's grave, that's different.