Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
The whole argument I am making is, there is zero details besides what some random guy nobody knows says is true. Fine, I'll go with this, if the photographer shows his identity, so he is accountable for his accusations.
|
Sure, as I said I don't think it's reasonable for people to have anything more than an "If these particular details are true then shame on her" response. If they do then they're being unreasonable, and the fault is with the ones being unreasonable.
But like I said having a disproportionate response to an assumed idea is a significant portion of the posts here (or most forums). But I think giving people the ability to say what they want as much as I can is a greater good than the good that would come from locking down unreasonable posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
You of all people know that should be shrouded in green text. But it is essentially what is being done to this woman.
|
Ah but you admit it's not green text! It isn't what's being done to the woman, semantically yes, but someone wrongly being accused of letting their dog poop where not allowed isn't the same degree as someone being wrongly accused of being a pedophile.