Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Sure, but that just provides more questions then answers. If his talent has has significantly progressed:
-Why does he not have a bigger role?
- Why does he not have a more prominant place?
-Are his linemates actually worse and if they are should he not be elevating them?
The production is only marginally more. It's not a "wow" increase. I mean it's better then nothing (or worse a regression) but nothing to write home about.
Sure but Monahan was the "the man" with the 67's. Even if his points increased only slighly he did it while having his level of responsibility increase significantly.
It's slightly better... 3.1% increase, 17.1% vs 20.2%. Since Monahan was mentioned above in his draft year he was in on 39% of the 67's scoring. Methodology was I went to HockeyDB looked up team stats for the appropriate years counted all the goals and then divided individual point totals by the team goals total.
|
What do you want out of this discussion? What is the end goal you have in mind? To discredit the growth Jankowski has had? To marginalize it? It's true, he's not a wow college player. I don't know what else to suggest but get over it? Is there a particular person you think it's being unreasonable with their expectations? I just don't know who the audience or what the point of these kinds of posts is anymore.
It's like Flames fans trolling Flames fans.