Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar
Yes, because both situations represent intentional abuse of public money for personal gain. In the case of the Senators, they also appear to have fudged some of their reports.
|
No, one situation involved parties that abused public money by claiming expenses that they were not entitled to, or that never existed in the first place.
The other involves a retired military veteran who claimed expenses that he was
entitled to out of this retirement benefits package