Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Blueliner
Try not to take it so personally, strom. Vulcan said they hated being called Redskins and I just said nobody is doing such a thing.
In regards to the article which quotes the same guy who abhors the term, only the American Heritage Dictionary editors clearly state it to be acceptable. The Cherokee writer says its ok, but that the actual tribe is preferred as it is respectful and not a simplification of who they are.
Then she correctly points out "What matters in the long run is not which term is used but the intention with which it is used." Looking at the origin of Redskin and the fact that the entire organization is named for this term would lead one to believe that the intention is certainly not to offend or to be a joke. This name identifies not only the players, but all personnel involved including the front office/owners. It is meant to symbolize strength, bravery, loyalty, etc.
|
Don't worry, nothing taken personal at all.
"Redskin" is racist. It's collectively agreed upon as racist. If you're going to take the quote from that writer and assume it means you can use a racist term when describing Native Americans, then you're simply daft.
Redskin is a racist term, it has been (and still is) used as a racist term, and is not appropriate for a sports team.
The argument you're trying to make doesn't exist, you're just making yourself sound obtuse. If you really think that term is appropriate, then I implore you to make your way to the Tsuu T'ina reserve and start calling everyone "Redskin". See how well it goes over. I'd love for you to do it and record your findings. Let me know how acceptable and appropriate everyone finds it. Because after all, a middle aged white man telling them they shouldn't be offended by it is definitely going to work.
Please, let me know how it goes for you.