View Single Post
Old 02-14-2014, 02:21 PM   #27
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
I define a losing season as a year where you don't make the playoffs.

16 teams make the playoffs. Right now 14 miss. You add two more teams and you get 16 teams that will miss the playoffs. That is 2 more teams with "losing seasons".

2 more teams that will possibly fire their coach. 2 more fanbases that will be disgruntled that their team didn't make the playoffs, 2 more empty buildings, etc...

Is this about revenue or profit? Because you will add revenue to the NHL with 2 more teams, but overall league wide profit will come down.

The NHL should invest in buying out 2 teams, and going back to 28. Reduce the number of games to 76-80, and end the season by the end of May.

This is getting ridiculous. 32 teams.
I don't disagree with you one bit. However if they think they can increase revenue then they'll do it. They probably don't see the profit coming down like you do. I'm not going to try to even guess what this will do to the league economics apart from more revenue.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote