Quote:
Originally Posted by ranchlandsselling
Pretty offensive post.
And your post, yeah, we can assume that (did you mean ignorant vs. arrogant) and I'd actually prefer there was no process and it just got put up vs. a big debate/discussion/approval process - and it's fair of me to suggest a "children at play" sign in a neighborhood has a more positive impact on protecting kids getting hit by cars than a flag has on the LGBT community in Calgary or on Russian politics. Which I'm allowed to have without being accused of having a lack of sympathy, prejudices or a sarcastic accusation that I'm not a functioning human.
I think flamewin's attitude and the above post are far more ignorant/rude than anything I posted.
|
Yeah ignorant. For some reason i thought your post said arrogant.
It seems like your problem is that there is a process at all, not that the flag is being set up. Well that's how democratic governments work. Sorry. Yes it's bureaucratic, but there's not really any other choice. In the sign example, the impact is really irrelavent. Some people got together and put in motion the process to have the sign/the flag put up. And thus, it got done. If someone had done the same for Egypt or Syria or whatever, they may have also had success, who knows.
I'm not sure how my post is offensive.