View Single Post
Old 02-09-2014, 07:26 PM   #54
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
I think we need to wait until poilerve responds to the accusation they didnt meet.

The elections Canada spokesperson said that Mayrand was not "consulted on the contents of the bill". Poilerve is saying "I did meet with the CEO of Elections Canada some time ago and we had a terrific and a very long meeting, at which I listened carefully to all of his ideas,"

These two statements do not conflict with eachother. Mayrands spokesperson is saying they didnt review the bill, Poilerve is saying they discussed ideas about the bill some time ago.

Both quotes are slimey and reak of politics.

Here is the governments version of the bill, time to read the actual bill and see whats in there.

http://www.democraticreform.gc.ca/en...-elections-act
Why would the impartial, non-partisan electoral commissioner make political statements?
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote