View Single Post
Old 02-04-2014, 08:06 AM   #334
Kjesse
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan View Post
The fact that Knox changed her story isn't evidence--it's innuendo.
You are making a lot of comments in this thread that are demonstrably wrong and this is another one. At law, changing your own story means you made a prior inconsistent statement, and it is evidence as to your credibility. In general, and in this case in particular, it can be used to impeach a witnesses testimony at trial. At the first trial Knox was impeached on several fronts, her prior inconsistent statement being only one of them.
Kjesse is offline   Reply With Quote