02-03-2014, 11:34 PM
|
#330
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
Amanda Knox's judge says he suffered over guilty verdict
Quote:
Judge Alessandro Nencini also suggested in an interview with Italy's most prominent newspaper Corriere della Sera published Saturday that the decision of Knox's ex-boyfriend and co-defendant, Raffaele Sollecito, not to testify may have worked against him.
"It's the defendant's right, but it certainly deprived the process of a voice," Nencini was quoted as saying. "He limited himself to spontaneous declarations. He said only what he wanted to say without letting himself be cross-examined." Knox did not appear at the trial, but sent a letter to the court saying she feared wrongful conviction.
|
Quote:
The newspaper said Nencini consented to the interview because he knew the sentence would create a media storm.
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/amanda-...dict-1.2520222
Amanda Knox letter tried to convince Italian court of her innocence
Quote:
NO FORENSIC EVIDENCE AGAINST ME
No physical evidence places me in Meredith’s bedroom, the scene of the crime, because I was not there and didn’t take part in the crime.
Meredith’s murderer left ample evidence of his presence in the brutal scenario: handprints, footprints, shoe prints in Meredith’s blood; DNA in her purse, on her clothing, in her body.
The prosecution has failed to explain how I could have participated in the aggression and murder – to have been the one to fatally wound Meredith – without leaving any genetic trace of myself.
That is because it is impossible. It is impossible to identify and destroy all genetic traces of myself in a crime scene and retain all genetic traces of another individual.
Either I was there, or I wasn’t. The analysis of the crime scene answers this question: I wasn’t there
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...innocence.html
__________________
|
|
|