Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar
Anyway, their blood was found mixed together in the bathroom, for sure, and there was expert disagreement as to whether mixed blood was found in the room where the murder took place.
|
No it was not. Amanda's blood perhaps existed in the washroom, but so what? That was not the crime scene, and it was in such small amounts, similar to anyone's bathroom. I bet her blood was on her pillow and phone as well. These are basically guarantees when it comes to collecting DNA.
What I find amazing is that the crime scene had evidence of one person and only that person's footprints slipping around the blood. Yet for some reason, you think Amanda was bleeding? They found no cuts or scratches on her at all.
So explain to us why her own blood, in a minuscule drop in the bathroom, matters at all? How does that mean she murdered someone?
This is crazy.
There was no expert disagreement. There were no experts for the prosecution - their incompetence was proven, thus not an expert.