Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar
That website is no better than the several that claim Knox definitely is guilty. There was testimony about the bloody prints in particular which said they were consistent with Knox (and socellito for that matter).
|
You just need to use a little common sense when reading reviews of evidence. The explanation there is simple and anyone that is even remotely educated can analyse it and draw a conclusion. You can do that with all the sites out there. The article is simple, straight forward and makes a whole lot of sense. What part do you not understand about it? It is really a pretty simple analysis, I don't see any spin there.